Larp with Erasmus: A Quantitative Study of Live Action Roleplay Projects Funded by EUs Erasmus+ Program Between 2014-2022

Authors

  • Karin Johansson Uppsala University
  • Mafalda Morganti Chaos League

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33063/ijrp.vi19.1254

Abstract

Abstract: As live action role-play (larp) has grown in popularity and is being implemented in a wide range of domains, it has also started getting attention from policy makers. During the last decade, the EU has funded many larp-related projects, in particular through its Erasmus+ program. Erasmus+ is an important channel for EU policymaking with sought impacts on
cultural enhancement and the fostering of an EU identity.

This quantitative study presents and analyzes a database of 111 larp related projects that have received funding from Erasmus+ between 2014-2022. The results show that 5,770,000 euros in funding were granted in total, with a moderate positive trend over time. Project coordinators originated from 22 different EU countries, and the funding distribution is uneven, with Poland, Estonia and Denmark being among countries receiving the most grants. While some projects focus on developing larp as a practice, the vast majority (89.9%) use larp as a tool to pursue other policy values, with some of the most common being tolerance, migration, democracy, and employability.
This study showcases how the EU gives substantial funding to larp related projects through Erasmus+. The study is relevant as funding and policy making affects the larp community, and also points towards how the larp community, through these projects, also affect the EU on a policy making level. This study can help inform both larp organisations and larp researchers by providing the first quantitative analysis of larp funding and projects financed through the EU.

Keywords: live action role-playing, larp, quantitative study, Erasmus+, European Union

References

Barnett, Clive. 2001. “Culture, Policy, and Subsidiarity in the European Union: From Symbolic Identity to the Governmentalisation of Culture.” Political Geography 20 (4): 405–26. Link here.

Bowman, Sarah Lynne. 2014. “Educational Live Action Role-Playing Games: A Secondary Literature Review.” ” In Wyrd Con Companion Book 2014, edited by Sarah Lynne Bowman, 112-131. Los Angeles, CA: Wyrd Con. Link here.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic Analysis. SAGE.

Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (European Commission). 2021. Erasmus+ 2021–2027: Enriching Lives, Opening Minds through the EU Programme for Education, Training, Youth and Sport. Publications Office of the European Union. Link here.

European Commission. 2019a. “Erasmus+ Project Details: 2019-1-SI01-KA204-060382. Improving ‘Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments’ Skill of Low-Skilled Adults with Gamification, Serious Games and LARP.” Erasmus+ Project Database. Link here.

———. 2019b. “EU-Eastern Partnership Cooperation through Erasmus+.” EU NeighborsEast Link here.

———. 2020. “Erasmus+ Project Details: 2020-1-CZ01-KA205-078036. DEMOPlayer.” Erasmus+ Project Database. Link here.

———. 2021. “Erasmus+ Project Details: 2021-1-EE01-KA220-SCH-000032573. GreenEduLARP.” Erasmus+ Project Database. Link here.

Eurostat. n.d. “Eurostat: Country Codes.” Accessed 27 March 2025. Link here.

Erasmus+. 2025. “How to Take Part - Erasmus+.” Accessed 24 March 2025. Link here.

Jacobone, Vittoria, and Giuseppe Moro. 2015. “Evaluating the Impact of the Erasmus Programme: Skills and European Identity.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (2): 309–28. Link here.

Jamovi. 2024. Jamovi (Version 2.6.44) [Computer software]. Link here.

Johansson, Karin, Johanna Koljonen, Jaakko Stenros, PerOla Öberg, and Sarah Lynne Bowman. 2026. “Playing a Role in Democracy: Political Live Action Role-playing Games, Activism, and Deliberation.” In Education and Analog Role-Playing Games: Theory and Pedagogy, edited by Susan Haarman. CRC Press.

Johansson, Karin, Raquel Robinson, Jon Back, Sarah Lynne Bowman, James Fey, Elena Márquez Segura, Annika Waern, and Katherine Isbister. 2024. “Why Larp? A Synthesis Article on Live Action Roleplay in Relation to HCI Research and Practice.” ACM Transactions on

Computer-Human Interaction 31 (5): 64:1–64:35. Link here.

Kangas, Kaisa, Mika Loponen, and Jukka Särkijärvi, eds. 2016. Larp Politics: Systems, Theory, and Gender in Action. Knutepunkt Books. Link here.

Lacanienta, Andrew. 2022. “Live Action Role-Play as Pedagogy for Experiential Learning.” SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education 37 (1–2): 70–76. Link here.

Larpocracy. n.d. “About.” Larpocracy. Accessed 27 March 2025. Link here.

Osmond, William James. 2023. A Politics of Participation and Representation in Live Action Roleplaying. PhD diss., Guildford School of Acting, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.

R Core Team. 2024. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Link here.

Rantanen, Teemu. 2016. “Larp as a Form of Political Action: Some Insights from Theories of Political Science.” In Larp Politics: Systems, Theory, and Gender in Action, edited by Kaisa Kangas, Mika Loponen, and Jukka Särkijärvi. Knutepunkt Books. Link here.

Stewart, Jenny. 2009. Public Policy Values. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Link here.

Triola, Mario. 2014. Elementary Statistics: Selected Chapters. 12th ed. Uppsala University Edition. Pearson.

Uppsala University. 2024. “New Research Project: Larpocracy.” Uu.se, October 3. Link here.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Johansson, K., & Morganti, M. (2026). Larp with Erasmus: A Quantitative Study of Live Action Roleplay Projects Funded by EUs Erasmus+ Program Between 2014-2022. International Journal of Role-Playing, (19), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.33063/ijrp.vi19.1254