Negotiated Positivism: The disregarded epistemology of Arne Furumark
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33063/jaah.vi22.80Keywords:
epistemology,, logical positivism, archaeology as history, Aegean Bronze Age, Mycenaean pottery, culture historical archaeology, positivism, processualismAbstract
Archaeological theory during the twentieth century is often presented according to a tri-partite scheme. This article serves to put this model into question through the explication of the epistemology of the Swedish classical archaeologist Arne Furumark. He introduced a heuristic model for ceramic studies in 1941 that bears the hallmarks of logical positivism. This early appropriation of analytical philosophy in classical archaeology does not resonate with the above-mentioned model of archaeological theory. However, Furumark did not adopt the agenda of processual archaeology wholeheartedly as the greater part of his research was founded on a culture historical framework. Furumark’s epistemology was negotiated between two archaeological paradigms, or two branches of positivism.